Daily Archives: October 21, 2010

Methods to Monitor Practice Performance – Billing and Collections

October 21, 2010 in Blog, Uncategorized by support Team  |  Comments Off on Methods to Monitor Practice Performance – Billing and Collections

Each encounter at a Physician’s office generates numerous Diagnosis and CPT codes. A practice needs to appropriate manage their billing and collections for the practice to be effective and efficient. If a physician has 20-30 patient visits a day, the physician might generate 100-200 CPT codes (or more) each day. Each of these CPT codes needs the appropriate DX codes to optimize payment with each insurance company. Even with the ‘right’ diagnosis codes, Insurance companies change their ‘scrubbers’ and ‘rules’ to accepting claims. For instance, one of the regional carriers changed their scrubbers in Mid March 2010 to deny multiple adm codes 90466 unless the code utilized “Units” on the first 90466. The biller needs to follow-up on the claim, resubmit, if denied, investigate the reason further. In the 90466 example, we learned that neither the local insurance representative or our clearing house group were aware of the change (the carriers do not inform billing teams of the changes in their practices and how to be appropriately paid).

How does your billing team monitor this issue? Do they take the time and extra effort to resubmit the claims? Are there other billers that do not have day to day responsibility for the account that perform an audit 1x per month? What are some benchmarks to monitor how well the practice is doing with the billing and collections?

On the last question, there are standards/guidelines established by the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA). The benchmarks in MGMA are fairly non-biased and provide data for a practice administrator or physician partner to monitor the billing performance. Three benchmarks include % of collections to contract amount, # of Accounts Receivable (AR) days, distribution of sick-code office visits, and % of total revenue spent on billing and collections. The ideal is to move the practice to be collecting above the MGMA benchmark goal, maintain the number of AR days to less than 35, a ‘reasonable’ distribution of visit types, as well as a cost of billing that is within the national rate for the specialty. If your practice is meeting/exceeding all these benchmarks – great job…congratulate your billing team and look for further areas to optimize the revenue cycle. If your practice is below is more than one of these areas, drill down and identify what is the ‘root’ problem and work each week to improve.

Electronic Health Records – Certification – October 2010

October 21, 2010 in Blog, Uncategorized by support Team  |  Comments Off on Electronic Health Records – Certification – October 2010

Health and Human Services named three certification bodies within the same thirty day period: The Drummond Group, CCHIT and InfoGard. These organizations all test on the same requirements to verify that an Electronic Health Record (E.H.R.) system or an E.H.R. module meets the guidelines established by the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC). E.H.R. certifications started in September 2010 and will continue into 2011. A certification is good for 2011/2012.

For E.H.R. systems that focused in a single specialty (e.g. Pediatrics), these systems still need to meet the standards for all the criteria. Further information can be found in the final rule created by ONC. A vendor needs to work with an ONC approved certification body to confirm the terms and conditions of certification including the time-line that is agreeable to both parties. There are hundreds of Vendors starting the certification process now that the criteria is confirmed as well as the first three certification bodies have been named. Interesting that some of the large E.H.R. companies paid about 2x the cost of certification a year ago to one of the current certification bodies (CCHIT) anticipating that they would have certification first and this would be a competitive advantage. From the providers perspective, there is no difference to them if the E.H.R. is certified in October 2010 or March 2011.