Uncategorized

Will EHR technology previously certified under any other programs or organizations automatically

August 24, 2010 in Blog, Uncategorized by support Team  |  Comments Off on Will EHR technology previously certified under any other programs or organizations automatically

No. In order to meet regulatory requirements implementing the HITECH Act, including the definition of “Certified EHR Technology,” EHR technology (Complete EHRs and/or EHR Modules) must be tested and certified by an ONC-ATCB. Any other certifications issued by an organization that is not an ONC-ATCB at the time of issuance will be invalid for purposes of meeting the definition of Certified EHR Technology and cannot be used to qualify for incentive payments under the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive

Programs. Unless reissued in accordance with the requirements of the temporary certification program, certifications previously issued by an online casino organization that has subsequently become an ONC-ATCB will also be invalid for purposes of satisfying the definition of “Certified EHR Technology,” because such certifications were issued prior to the organization achieving ONC-ATCB status.

Certification by an ONC-ATCB means that EHR technology meets the specific standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria established for the temporary certification program. (HHS issued an interim final rule outlining specific standards and certification criteria on December 30, 2009, and a final rule is expected to be issued in the near future.)

EHR technology must be tested and certified by an organization authorized by ONC as an ONC-ATCB, using currently adopted standards and certification criteria. Once ONC has authorized testing and certification organizations as ONC-ATCBs, the follow actions are appropriate:

Developers of EHR technology who wish to have their EHR technology tested and certified

Health care providers who are eligible under the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive

ONC Roadmap for Health IT

August 24, 2010 in Blog, Uncategorized by support Team  |  Comments Off on ONC Roadmap for Health IT

Federal Health IT Strategic Plan was published in June 2008. As part of the 2009 HITECH

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) has a vision for interoperable health IT all over the nation. This work requires that ONC supports the creation of a learning health system that is patient-centered and uses information to improve health and health care of individuals and the population continuously. ONC started to obtain input for a detailed roadmap outlining goals, principles, objectives, strategies, and tactics for this effort. This roadmap will pave the road to ONC’s vision and help the health system be accountable.

The original Act, included in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, must update the 2008 Strategic Plan.

The updated Federal Health IT Strategic Plan will tell about objectives, milestones, and metrics related to health information exchange and associated privacy and security protections, electronic health record utilization, and will point out the needs of underserved populations to reduce health disparities. It will basically address the time period of 2011 through 2015 but it also will lay the groundwork for continued innovation and progress past 2015.

The strategic planning process will depend upon your insights and experience. We would like the process to be highly participatory, with bold involvement across the health care sector, and opportunities for public input and discussion. To this end, the HIT Policy Committee’s Strategic Plan Workgroup is tasked with developing for the Policy Committee the Health IT Strategic Framework to give notice to the strategic planning process and providing a vehicle for public and private input.

The Framework will have recommendations for the Committee for updates to the Federal Health IT

Strategic Plan. The present draft Framework organizes key strategies into four themes: meaningful use of health IT; policy and technical infrastructure; privacy and security; and learning health systems. For each theme there are goals, principles, objectives, and strategies. Ultimately, the Federal Health IT Strategic Plan will go two steps further by planning specific tactics and measures per theme.

Certification Programs

August 24, 2010 in Blog, Uncategorized by support Team  |  Comments Off on Certification Programs

Certification of Health IT will provide assurance to purchasers and other users that an EHR system, or other relevant technology, offers the necessary technological capability, functionality, and security to help them meet the meaningful use criteria established for a given phase. Providers and patients must also be confident that the electronic health IT products and systems they use are secure, can maintain data confidentially, and can work with other systems to share information. Confidence in health IT systems is an important part of advancing health IT system adoption and allowing for the realization of the benefits of improved patient care.The Health Information Technology: Initial Set ofestablishes certification programs for purposes of testing and certifying health information

Eligible professionals and eligible hospitals who seek to qualify for incentive payments under the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs are required by statute to use Certified EHR Technology. Once certified, Complete EHRs and EHR Modules would be able to be used by eligible professionals and eligible hospitals, or be combined, to meet the statutory requirement for Certified EHR Technology.

To this end, as issued in June 2010, 45 CFR Part 170 – Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record technology. This Rule specifically establishes:
A temporary certification program to assure the availability of Certified EHR Technology prior to
A permanent certification program to replace the temporary certification program.

Learn more about the RuleFact Sheet

Frequently Asked Questions

Additional InformationIn collaboration with ONC, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is developing th functional and conformance testing requirements, test cases, and test tools to support the proposed Health IT Certification Programs. These conformance test methods (test procedures, test data, and test tools) will help ensure compliance with the meaningful use technical requirements and standards.

Should a practice adopt the same EHR system as their local hospital?

August 13, 2010 in Blog, Uncategorized by support Team  |  Comments Off on Should a practice adopt the same EHR system as their local hospital?

A local hospital might have a large enterprise EHR system. The system designed to be a ‘general’ system for all areas of Medicine. This requires many fields and the providers to mold to the system. This system can be difficult to use since the system is not designed around a specific Medical Specialty. Pediatricians have much different day to day patients than Cardiologists. The EHR sales representatives might call the practice and provide concerns that if they do not use their system, the practice might have a challenging time working with the hospital system. The physicians and other providers might have entered a few hospital orders in the EHR system in the hospital but not seen 20-30 patients in a day in their office (big difference). For some of these reasons, there are practice owners that believe they need to use the same system adopted by their local Hospital.

The government was concerned about interoperability in the health care system and provided a solution that allows a physician practice to choose the appropriate EHR for their practice and not be forced to choose the Hospital EHR system. Through the HITECH act, the Health and Human Services are funding the ability for states to have Health Exchanges. Hospitals in the state as well as laboratories will connect to these Health Exchanges. This means that any EHR system can connect to the exchange to share data (lab data, hospital data, etc.). Once the exchange is built, the practice only needs to connect to the exchange and will be able to send and receive appropriate data for any hospital in the state. This provides the practice the flexibility to choose any EHR system (assuming the EHR company has the experience/technology to link to the exchange) while not giving up function. Practices should choose an EHR system based on the quality of the product and the service.

Should a Physician Practice Outsource their Medical Billing?

August 13, 2010 in Blog, Uncategorized by support Team  |  Comments Off on Should a Physician Practice Outsource their Medical Billing?

I have visited in hundreds of Physician Offices and seen a wide range of billing operations. Physicians have a very difficult job to stay current on diseases as well as medical treatments. The world of medical/insurance claims and practice management changes daily with new rules for rejecting claims as well as changes on how to bill (e.g. see article on “billing options for flu clinics”). Insurance companies invest in ‘scrubbers’ and software products that reject claims based on certain rules. These rules change constantly. There are vendors that create software for Insurance Companies with these claim edits. I have met and seen these systems at the vendor display area of the American Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) annual conference. Sales representatives for software vendors with this claim logic system sell to insurance company executives the amount of money their system can save an insurance plan. Insurance executives are very aware that many billers for Physician Offices do not resubmit claims. Insurance companies utilize these systems and some have probably denied what most would consider appropriate claims. For example, the courts provided a judgment in 2010 against United Healthcare for using a software system that rejected many insurance claims that should not have been rejected.

Unfortunately, many owners of practices are losing thousands of dollars each year due to their billing system. Worse, most are not aware that they are missing this revenue. For example, a practice that generates $1,000,000 in total yearly revenue might feel that they are doing well. Usually, I would ask a physician partner or practice administrator, “What is your collection rate of the contract insurance amount?” Many practices are unaware what their collection rate of the contract amount. Benchmarking organizations like the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) consider collecting 95% of the contract amount for all claims to be ‘good’. This would mean that if the practice brings in $1,000,000 per year in receivables that the practice is unable to collect $50,000. This $50,000 is usually insurance claims and/or patient statements that poor billing systems/operations miss. At Doctor Office Management, Inc, using the PhysicianXpress system, we have a system that benchmarks to 99% of the contract amount. So far, we have been able to achieve this benchmark for our billing clients.

Many software systems used for Medical Billing are difficult for a physician partner to answer these simple questions. Additionally, ‘drilling down’ or ‘spot checking’ might not be possible for a physician partner to view specifics on a claim as needed. I have been in physician offices for which the providers are very knowledgeable on Medical diseases, treatments and have invested much in their facilities and equipment but their billing systems that are based on technology from the 1980s or 1990s. Since insurance rules change, in some cases, monthly, using a ‘dated’ system places the complete burden on the billing staff and practice managers. Even if the billing staff and practice managers for a practice are top in their field, they would not have the time & resources to stay current with the insurance claim edits.

Speaking of billers and practice Management, there are many questions a physician partner needs to insure if they choose to perform billing and patient statements with their own staff. Some of these questions include: Do the billers and management have the depth of skills for today’s insurance climate? Can all the billers explain the difference between a 99213, 99214 and 99215? Are there formal SOPs in the practice which includes an audit system? How much redundancy occurs in the operation? Does the practice check the billers work and provide feedback? If not, how much revenue is being lost that the practice owners are unaware of? Does the practice management have the skills to interview and constantly check on the performance of the billers? Is the practice able to bring in new talent that utilizes the latest or is there a system to improve the skills sets for the billers? Does the practice establish benchmarks for ‘good’ performance? What type of feedback loop does the billing team use to communicate with the other stakeholders and influencers of the revenue cycle (providers and front desk)?

There has been a dramatic shift in design of insurance policies in the last twenty years. Billing and patient statements were very predictable when most of the insurances were 80/20. Today, most insurances are PPOs/HMOs with <5% that pay the entire billed amount. More and more patients have high deductible plans as well as plans that limit the number of well checks per year. The revenue cycle is constantly changing. Benchmarking is difficult to do with one physician office. MGMA has a strong benchmarking history in practice management. In some of the highly regarded revenue cycle courses they provide benchmarks. One important benchmark is how many days of Accounts Receivable (AR) does the practice have outstanding. If the practice bills on average $1000 (evaluate over 1 year of time) and the practice has $60,000 in AR then the AR days are 60. MGMA sources show that 60 is the average for a practice and better the 40 is ‘good’. Using the PhysicianXpress system, Doctor Office Management, Inc. benchmarks 30 AR days as ‘good’. This is 25% higher benchmark than MGMA groups provide.

From a cost stay point, a physician office needs to be able to identify the salary paid to the biller, the time needed per month for management (whether the physician partner manages or a practice manager), benefits, taxes, office space, training and time for hiring replacements if the biller leaves, is sick for extended period of time or underperforms. Additionally, there is a cost for postage, maintaining the computer, office area, phone lines, and supplies of the biller. There are many articles by the Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) groups that provide further background and depth related to Medical Billing Outsourcing as well as how to determine if a practice should outsource. One good article I found on the subject is http://www.globalservicesmedia.com/BPO/Industry-specific-Processes/Should-Your-Practice-Outsource-Medical-Billing/23/29/9739/GS100618688470