Uncategorized

Optimal Coding by the Pediatric Physician / Provider and the Revenue Cycle

November 27, 2010 in Blog, Uncategorized by support Team  |  Comments Off on Optimal Coding by the Pediatric Physician / Provider and the Revenue Cycle

Healthcare is a very complex field. After attending college and Medical School, physicians invest years of time and effort to learn the focus of their specialty. Pediatricians spend three (3) years in Residency after Medical School. Pediatric residency includes rotations in NICU, PICU, ER, Cardiology, Pulmonary, office practice as well as other areas related to Pediatrics. This is much different than a Surgery, Ortho or Radiology Residencies. Similar to the Medical training in Pediatrics, the coding in Pediatrics is differs from other specialties. There are routine updates to the CPT and Diagnosis codes as well as the scrubber logic/systems at insurance companies. This requires continuous learning and improvement by the entire billing team and providers.

The revenue cycle is comprised of the front end and back end. Traditionally, a practice labels the back end of the revenue cycle as the “billing team”. This is only half correct. The front desk and providers (front end of the revenue cycle) are a critical component of the revenue cycle to insure that the proper procedures/codes are captured at the time of the visit as well as to appropriately check in the patient. A well designed system can optimized the revenue cycle for Pediatrics by attaching code automatically (e.g. when a vaccine is added, the administration codes added automatically). The back-end billing team needs to submit & resubmit (as needed) the claim to the insurance companies, print patient statements and follow-up on the claim. The back end billing team should also have communication with the front desk and providers related to appropriate update/changes in billing practices and/or a certain claim.

There are many variables in the revenue cycle including: patients/families with various types of insurance (HMO, PPO, H.S.A.) as well as numerous insurance companies each with their own payment structure and systems. The front desk team needs to be trained on how to intake insurances for verification. Additionally, the front desk team needs to be monitored and provided feedback on their work performance. The Pediatricians and/or providers also need some initial training on coding and monitoring to provide feedback on what they are doing well as well as what they can do to improve. I have seen some providers be able to identify all appropriate billing opportunities while others have a small range of variability in their coding.

Think for a minute of the range of codes in a Pediatric visit: a simple sick visit with one diagnosis and one CPT code (e.g. 463 – DX code, 99213 – CPT Code) to a complex well/sick visit that includes multiple vaccines (e.g. greater than the eight diagnosis codes and more than 6 CPT codes). If a provider averages 80 patient visits a week for fifty weeks a year, the provider see approximately 4000 patient visits a year. This Pediatric provider might have 25,000 to 35,000 CPT/DX codes attached to these visits. A well designed system as well as trained providers, front desk and back-end billing team utilizing a system designed for Pediatrics built on today’s technology should optimize the revenue cycle for the practice. The system should automatically attached procedure CPT codes when a procedure is selected. Also, when a vaccine is given, the system should automatically attached administration codes. Well check coding is very similar for each visit with the variables being the procedures, vaccines and/or if the patient is also sick and should have sick codes. The practice should have a clearly written policy on how they manage the fall flu injections. This policy needs to be shared with the front desk and back-end billing teams.

The American Academy of Pediatrics has a good selection of training courses for providers and back end billing team members. Providers should routinely take courses and/or obtain updates so they can appropriate select the ‘right’ code for the visit. Pediatricians and pediatric providers have much to manage in their practice. For even a highly skilled Pediatrician, managing all the details associated with a practice is very time consuming and challenging. Providers that do not have a strong understanding or interest in the revenue cycle of a practice might have unrealistic expectations on managing the details of the revenue cycle (e.g. variability of payment from different insurance companies, % of patients that pay). Organizations, such as the Medical Group Management Association, have tools and benchmarks for practices. These benchmarks include % of revenue collected to the contract amount as well as the average amount of accounts receivable waiting to be paid. A well design system should be able to provide reports to evaluate both the ‘big picture’ as well as to drill down on each detail. As the front end and back end billing team move to a steady state, a partner should invest a few hours a month to run the reports to see the status of the practice performance. If the practice is performing above the performance benchmarks, congratulate yourself and your team. If the practice is performing below the performance benchmarks, identify the issue: is it a revenue capture by the providers? Speed of being paid? Amount of $ in Accounts Receivable? Is it patient collections?

There are numerous articles written on why practices should outsource their billing operation (the attached link is an example http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/medical/medical-best-practices-advice/when-should-you-outsource-your-medical-billing-1032610/ ). The providers still need to optimize their check-in procedures as well as select the procedures when outsourcing their billing. Many outsource billing organizations have limited transparency. The practice should be able to audit the back-end billing team ‘real time’ as needed. The back-end billing operation should have a written audit process for which billers audit each account. The back-end billing team should also have coverage when the primary biller or billers are on vacation or sick leave. The providers need to have a resource in the back end billing team to ask or send questions/clarifications.

Although healthcare is a complex field, a well designed system and processes along with proper training can simplify the work for a practice, optimize the revenue cycle, and minimize the staffing cost to a practice.

The Importance of continuous Training related to Electronic Health Records

November 21, 2010 in Blog, Uncategorized by support Team  |  Comments Off on The Importance of continuous Training related to Electronic Health Records

Similar the field of medicine the field of electronic health records changes regularly. During the initial training of an electronic health record system, the providers and staff should have a basic understanding of how to register a patient, take the vitals, record the visit and if needed, send an electronic prescription. The initial training and initial use of the system will require the most work and effort to optimize the transition from paper to electronic records.

The initial training is only the start. I like to compare this as learning to ride a bike without training wheels. The first time a person is able to ride without training wheels they need to consciously think of how to balance, place feet, stop, etc. As the person spends more time riding the bike, the easier it is to increase the speed at which you ride the bike, increase the speed on corners. As the skill improve, the biker rides in a subconscious manner. Additional training should increase the ability of the biker.

Similar, when utilizing a new electronic health record system, the first few uses on the system is like the biker on the training wheels. Recommend there be 2 to 3 point people in the practice whom become ‘expert’ users. These can either be individuals that quickly move through the ‘training wheel’ phase and/or leaders in the group whom have a good affinity for computers and training. These individuals should provide training tips/updates to the practice (maybe during lunch) on a routine basis (every other month). The Health Information technology field is a dynamic and chaining field. You EMR system should be continuously improving and evolving.

Data back-up and Recovery of EHR/EMR data of a practice

November 11, 2010 in Blog, Uncategorized by support Team  |  Comments Off on Data back-up and Recovery of EHR/EMR data of a practice

Backing up multiple times per day provides data security and ‘peace of mind’. If your E.H.R. system needs to be maintained on a server within your office there is additional cost in time and money that practice needs to incur.

What if there is a power failure? Corruption of the database? Fire? How does your practice/system manage these scenarios to insure that at most the practice only loses a few hours of data? If the E.H.R. system your practice has in their office is client server then the practice needs to develop and execute a data back-up and recovery service. If your E.H.R. system is based on ‘cloud computing’ and maintained by the vendor, I recommend you ask some questions of the vendor. These questions include:

  • How many back-ups does the system make per day?
  • Does the main production server back-up to a redundant server?
  • Does the system contain a data vault for daily back-ups of all production and redundant servers?
  • Does the company have personnel with degrees in computer science and systems engineering?

If you receive some long pauses and non-direct answers on the questions above, ask to speak with a person from the company with a Computer Science or Systems Engineering experience. If they do not have any personnel with Computer Science or Systems Engineering degrees/experience, there might be further questions that you should ask to insure optimal data back-up and recovery.

Why the HITECH Act requires Certified E.H.R. products to read lab result data into E.H.R./EMR systems using an HL-7 Interface.

November 10, 2010 in Blog, Uncategorized by support Team  |  Comments Off on Why the HITECH Act requires Certified E.H.R. products to read lab result data into E.H.R./EMR systems using an HL-7 Interface.

There is much discussion about the HITECH act and certified E.H.R. products. There are over 42 PDF files that contain the Health and Human Services criteria for certifications. One of these files discusses the need for a ‘certified E.H.R.’ to read in lab results using an HL-7 interface. What is an HL-7 interface and why is this important?

HL-7 “Health Level Seven International” is the global authority on standards for interoperability of health information technology. HL-7 has been around since 1987 and was founded as a non-profit group. The vision of this organization is to “create the best and most widely used standards in Healthcare”. There are many details related to the HL-7 that can be found on their web site at www.hl7.org Many in the industry state that we have an HL-7 Interface. There are different versions of the HL-7 messages as well as different applications of HL-7. For instance, HL-7 can be utilized to exchange information with state immunization authorities, collect/send lab results as well as connect to a health exchange.

Related to Lab results, lab companies usually have the capabilities to send the data in lab reports in a structured format via an HL-7 interface. The advantage of this is that the lab results, in a proper system, can be searched to identify patients with certain lab values (e.g. H1AC >7.0). To meet the ‘certified E.H.R.’ requirements a vendor must be able to demonstrate that their HL-7 connection can read results into the E.H.R. The certifying body tests with specific patient lab test data to see how the system responds.

If your practice has an E.H.R. system that contains a HL-7 interface, it might take months or longer for the lab company to approve the connection. The reason is that the lab company usually verifies that the volume of lab requests meet a certain threshold for them to have their programming team connect the lab results interface. If your practice has an E.H.R. system with a working HL-7 interface, recommend work with your E.H.R. vendor as well as laboratory company representative to work out the details of the HL-7 interface. Once connected, the HL-7 interface provides the practice better connectivity and less scanning versus utilizing the paper method. Additionally, having the lab data as structured data into the system provides additional options for searching patients by lab results.

Optimizing Protection of Patient Data in an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) System

November 5, 2010 in Blog, Uncategorized by support Team  |  Comments Off on Optimizing Protection of Patient Data in an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) System

This week on the front page of the Market Place Section of the Wall Street Journal, there was an article titled “Worries Emerge Over Outsourcing of Electronic Medical Records” (By Amol Sharma in New Delhi and Ben Worthen in San Francisco, November 2, 2010). The authors of the article discuss that companies based out of India have less success winning E.H.R. contracts for Hospitals due primary to concerns of patient privacy of Health Records outside the United States. Patient privacy is a major concern within the Healthcare community. There are a few companies based in the United States that will provide a basic E.H.R. system for free if the physicians agree to advertising within the E.H.R. System.

With the risks of Medical Malpractice in the United States, a practice should first check with an attorney that specializing in Healthcare law prior to adopting a system with adverting and/or a company that ‘mines the data’ for selling to another company. Does the company use data ‘crawlers’ to identify treatment patterns and then send a targeted message to impact the way a physician treats a patient? If so, does this advertising increase the utilization of services/products paid by the government? Recommend a Healthcare attorney provide an initial review of all aspects of the ‘free’ system as well as a yearly audit. The reason for the yearly audit is that the patient privacy and healthcare laws change routinely.

Would a Malpractice attorney be able to pay a ‘free EMR’ company for a list of physicians that treat outside of certain standards? If the ‘free EMR’ company does not do this directly, there might be independent companies claiming to be advertisers whom are really companies that obtain this information from a ‘free EMR’ company via advertisers then sell this to Malpractice Attorneys.

Some points to consider when to optimize the protection of the patient data in an EMR system include:

  • Security of the system is critical, some software EMR systems are secure but the system is maintained on a ‘weak security’ network in a physician office. If using a client-server system, insure the network is consistently being maintained by qualified personnel.
  • Does the EMR Company maintain written protocols and procedures on how they maintain their data?
  • Ask the EMR Company where they maintain their data (e.g. is the primary or backup data maintained in the United States?)
  • Does the company have an Error and Emissions (E&O) Policy?
  • Is the data of the practice only seen by authorized users of the practice as well as authorized users of the E.M.R. company?
  • Does the company allow for selling of data or advertising in their system?