Monthly Archives: March 2011

Hidden Costs and Reliability Issues of Client-Server EHR systems

March 14, 2011 in EHR Selection by support Team  |  Comments Off on Hidden Costs and Reliability Issues of Client-Server EHR systems

While traveling to a potential customer, I met an individual that has 10 years experience as an IT consultant.  He worked at Accenture, then the Government and for the past three years works at an IT outsource company managing a department.  This IT professional reminded me, through his position and experiences, the issues that customers face when an application has multiple copies and versions.  He described the higher operating cost for the client-server systems and the difficulty at times identifying the issue due to variation of version, install, and local equipment (their team needs to travel occasionally on site to correct issues).

He expressed to me the advanages of cloud-based systems:  more consistent access for the IT support team to correct issues, continuous updates and lower operating costs.   He was familiar with the change from ICD-9 to ICD-10 and the impact on vendors of EHR/EMR and billing systems.   We discussed with client server systems, updates would need to be completed and verified with each location.   This is extra work for the vendor of client-server EMR systems as well as their clients.  Will client-server vendors use the ICD-10 changes as an opportunity to pass a cost on to their clients?  Well designed cloud-based EHR systems provides pediatric practices routine updates at a lower operating cost compared to client-server EMR systems.

The Future of Medical Billing for Pediatric Practices

March 7, 2011 in Billing and Collections by support Team  |  Comments Off on The Future of Medical Billing for Pediatric Practices

The credit card machine changed the methods that vendors collect bills due from customers.   Prior to the credit card, the customer had to have enough cash on hand, have a check or receive store credit.   Only a few generations ago, businesses needed staff and resources to collect on this store credit.  Once credit cards became available, businesses accepted credit cards for which the business would pay a percent of the charge to cover the costs associated with the credit card company collecting from the customer.   These businesses were able to eliminate or reassign the staff that managed the store credit. 

Medical billing is moving through a similar path.  Prior to the 1990s change to managed care, offices had individuals that prepared the bill and collected from the patient.  If the patient had insurance, the patient would take a receipt from the doctor’s office and submit to their insurance.   As managed care began the process of “In-network”;, offices utilized their billers to submit to managed care companies.  This process started simple (via paper) until the managed care plans invested in computers, software, and coding scrubbers.  Insurance companies learned that the skill of the ‘average’ office as well  as flaw in billing system/methods were not sophisticated enough for their systems.   The managed care plans were able to post strong profits.

Many offices still maintain medical billers.  Some invest well in training, people and Technology, others do not and/or do not know how.  Maintaining a medical biller is very difficult for smaller practices since they do not have enough revenue to justify the cost of a qualified biller as well as appropriate systems.   Even if a practice has the level of revenue to support a medical biller, many are not able to set up and
maintain a medical billing team with appropriate skill sets.   Practice Managers and practice consultants have a portion of their job dedicated to coaching, mentoring, hiring and training medical billers.  Is this
the best model?  Having a medical biller in the office has direct costs, indirect costs as well as an
additional burden to manage.  Interesting that many large Dow 30 companies outsource functions (such as payroll)…..shouldn’t physician practices?

Practices that adopt physicianxpress for EHR and medical billing achieve, to date, 99% collection rate
(contract amount) at a cost that is within the range of benchmarks for backend billing processes.   These practices can audit the claims for their practice real time and they do not need to invest in the cost of a biller, management of the biller, cost of training and retraining.   The medical billers at Doctor Office Management receive quarterly training from various sources (AAPC, AAP, MGMA).    It is much easier to be an auditor and ‘Monday morning quarterback”; than to hire, train, manage and audit a billing team on a continuous basis.  Since payers are becoming more complex to interact with, medical practices will see the benefits of moving the billing operation out of the office.

The advantages of Auto Formulary Advice in Pediatric Electronic Health Record Systems

March 1, 2011 in EHR Selection by support Team  |  Comments Off on The advantages of Auto Formulary Advice in Pediatric Electronic Health Record Systems

Let’s face it; parents are much busier today than a generation ago.  Kids have more activities at a younger age.   There are more medications today than a generation ago with varying degrees of managed care coverage.   If there are three asthma medications in the same therapeutic category, prescribing the ‘on-formulary’ medication saves time for parents.    

A Pediatric office accepts health insurance from multiple plans each with differences in formulary coverages.   A ‘typical’ drug formulary is three tiers.   Tier 1 is the generics tier, tier 2 is the preferred branded tier, and tier 3 is the non-preferred branded tier.  Each plan has a range in cost to the patient.  For example, tier 1 usually ranges $5-$10, tier 2 is $15-$35, tier 3 is $35 and up.  Since the formulary status of medications at plans changes routinely, staying up to date would be a full time job for a busy Pediatric practice.   This is where a well-built system that uses auto-formulary advice can save a practice time, lower costs to patients, and increase the adherence to a managed care plans formulary.

E-prescribing vendors and Electronic Health Record vendors have different options when they design and develop their systems.   Surescripts/Rx Hub maintain the data on products on formulary for each plan.  Many vendors link directly to the source (All Scripts, Nextgen, Physicianxpress) while others choose an indirect route via linking to another vendor (Dr. First).  Either source is dependent on the Internet to check formulary and send the prescription (another reason to choose cloud-based system).   When there is a problem with formulary advice:  a vendor with a direct connection to sure scripts needs to only diagnose their own system and communicate with sure scripts while a vendor that connects to another vendor whom connects with Surescripts has three systems that there could be a problem.

Reliability Engineering confirms that more systems in a series lead to more chances of failure/error.   Six sigma concepts also support less steps in the process.  When selecting an EHR, ask if the vendor if their system has directs links and achieved certification directly from sure scripts for formulary advice and sending scripts/refill requests.

Over the next two years there will be some significant branded drugs that lose patent protection.  This change in the market place will motivate managed care plans to further change and control formularies.   Pediatric practices that routinely use the formulary advice feature of an ‘optimal’ system should reduce their administrative burden while reducing costs for patients and payers.